FILE - A National Rifle Association (NRA) logo hitch cover sits on display ahead of the NRA annual meeting in Dallas, Texas, U.S., on Thursday, May 3, 2018. Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images
The fight over the killing of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis has turned into a rare public brawl inside the gun rights world, with the National Rifle Association calling a prominent federal prosecutor’s comments “dangerous and wrong.” What started as a local shooting has now pulled in President Donald Trump’s administration, federal law enforcement and Second Amendment activists who usually move in lockstep. At the center is a simple but explosive question: what message should the government send about armed citizens when police bullets are still fresh?
The Pretti shooting and a prosecutor’s online verdict
Alex Pretti’s death in Minneapolis has become a national flashpoint because it sits at the intersection of policing, immigration politics and gun culture. Video from the scene shows officers confronting the 37-year-old before opening fire, and the footage has quickly become the backbone of competing narratives about whether he posed an immediate threat. According to one Video review, the images do not show Pretti pointing a weapon at anyone, even though he did have a gun on him and officers later recovered it at the scene.
Despite those unresolved facts, a senior federal prosecutor in Southern California jumped into the fray with a social media post that lit the fuse. Bill Essayli, identified as a top prosecutor in the US Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles, wrote on X that “if you approach law enforcement with a gun in your hand, you are going to get shot,” effectively signaling that the shooting was likely justified before any full investigation had wrapped. His role inside the Attorney Office in Los Angeles, and the speed of his commentary, were quickly flagged by gun rights advocates who saw a powerful official telling armed citizens they should expect to die if police feel threatened, a stance documented in coverage of Bill Essayli and his post.
NRA backlash: “dangerous and wrong” from an unlikely critic
The NRA’s response landed with the force of a friendly fire incident. The organization, which has spent decades defending police and prosecutors who take a hard line on crime, publicly blasted Essayli’s framing of the Minneapolis shooting. In a statement highlighted by multiple outlets, the NRA said the idea that simply carrying a gun near officers makes a killing “likely justified” is “Dangerous and Wrong,” a phrase that has now become shorthand for the group’s break with the prosecutor. One detailed account of the group’s reaction describes how the NRA Slams Federal Prosecutor Who Claimed Shooting of Alex Pretti Was Likely Justified Because He Carried Gun, labeling that logic explicitly as Dangerous and Wrong in its criticism of the NRA Slams Federal argument.
That pushback did not come in isolation. Gun rights groups across the country, including activists who usually align with The Trump administration, have been openly skeptical of the official story that Pretti “posed a danger” because he was armed. Reporting on how NRA and other US gun activists push back at Trump officials notes that The Trump team has insisted Pretti carried a gun and was a threat, even as no available video shows him holding a weapon in the moments before shots were fired, a tension laid out in coverage of NRA and other challenging that narrative.
Video evidence, Trump officials and a split on self-defense
What makes this clash more than a Twitter spat is the growing gap between what the public can see and what federal officials are saying. Experts who have reviewed the footage say the video of the deadly Minneapolis shooting undermines early federal claims that Pretti was actively threatening officers at the moment they opened fire. Detailed analysis of the recordings, including slow-motion breakdowns and synced audio, has led several Experts to argue that the images contradict key Trump administration statements about the encounter, a point laid out in a video review of the incident.
Inside the White House orbit, officials have leaned heavily on the fact that Pretti was armed and had a history that they say justified officers’ fear. One senior aide, Deputy White House chief of staff Chris LaCivita, has been cited defending the idea that carrying a weapon in Minnesota can still trigger a lethal response if police believe a suspect is dangerous, even though state law allows many residents to carry a weapon in Minnesota. That tension between legal gun ownership and perceived threat is central to a separate analysis of how the footage contradicts Trump administration statements and how American policing culture often resists criticizing officers in high pressure shootings, a theme explored in coverage of Experts and their concerns.
About the Author
