Epstein asked Ferguson if she was coming to New York in a March 2010 email. Corbis via Getty Images
Corbis via Getty Images
The latest batch of Jeffrey Epstein documents has dragged another royal name back into the glare, and this time it is not Prince Andrew. Newly unsealed emails include a crude remark about Princess Eugenie that is attributed to her mother, Sarah Ferguson, in a private exchange with Epstein. The language is jarring on its own, but it lands even harder because it sits inside a long, messy history between Ferguson and the disgraced financier.
What might once have been dismissed as an off-color joke now carries real consequences. The emails are already reshaping public perceptions of Ferguson, rattling her charitable work and reopening questions about how closely parts of the royal orbit stayed tied to Epstein even after his crimes were widely known.
The email that stunned royal watchers
At the center of the uproar is a 2010 email in which Sarah Ferguson is reported to have made a vulgar comment about her younger daughter, Princess Eugenie, while corresponding with Jeffrey Epstein. The remark, described in court files as a crude sexualized line about Eugenie, appears in a message Ferguson sent when she was in regular contact with Epstein, who was already a convicted sex offender at that point. The newly unsealed material identifies the exchange as part of Epstein’s personal correspondence, placing Ferguson directly in his inbox at a time when many public figures were trying to distance themselves from him.
The email is detailed in documents that outline how Ferguson, who shares Princess Eugenie with her ex-husband Prince Andrew, communicated with Epstein about personal matters and social connections. Reporting on the cache notes that the crude line about Eugenie appears alongside other informal chatter, underscoring how casually Epstein and Ferguson seemed to speak about her adult daughter in private. The characterization of the message as a crude remark about Eugenie is backed up by descriptions in one set of filings that highlight Ferguson’s language toward her daughter in the unsealed emails.
How Ferguson stayed in Epstein’s orbit
The crude comment is not an isolated one-liner, it is part of a broader pattern that shows Sarah Ferguson maintaining contact with Epstein long after his first conviction. Newly released records describe “damaging email exchanges” that stretch beyond a single year, suggesting that Ferguson did not simply accept money from Epstein once and walk away. Instead, she appears in multiple messages that show her corresponding with him about personal and financial issues, even as his reputation collapsed. Those exchanges are cited in summaries that emphasize how Ferguson remained in Epstein’s circle, with the emails now forming a key part of the public record on that relationship.
One detailed account of the material notes that the same tranche of documents that includes the crude remark about Eugenie also shows Ferguson in the mix of Epstein’s contacts well into the period when his conduct was widely condemned. The description of “damaging email exchanges” involving Sarah Ferguson and Epstein is drawn from reporting on the newly released files that highlight how she stayed in touch with the financier and how those communications have now been exposed in newly unsealed files.
Princess Eugenie pulled into the fallout
For Princess Eugenie, who has largely built a life outside the core royal spotlight, the resurfacing of her mother’s relationship with Epstein is an unwelcome blast from the past. The crude line in the 2010 email effectively drags her into a scandal she did not create, attaching her name to Epstein’s in a way that is both personal and public. Eugenie, who married Jack Brooksbank in 2018 and has focused on work around modern slavery and environmental causes, now finds her image competing with a vulgar aside written about her in a private message to a convicted sex offender.
The documents that describe the email make clear that the remark is framed as a sexualized joke about Eugenie, and that it is attributed directly to Sarah Ferguson in the correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein. Coverage of the release notes that Ferguson’s comment about her daughter is labeled as “vulgar” in summaries of the 2010 exchange, underscoring how out of step it looks with the public image of a mother who has often spoken warmly about her close bond with Eugenie. That characterization of the email as a vulgar comment about Princess Eugenie in a 2010 message to Jeffrey Epstein is laid out in reporting that details how Ferguson spoke about inside Epstein’s inbox.
The charity paying the price
The shockwaves from the email release are not just reputational, they are organizational. Sarah Ferguson’s charitable organization has already announced that it will close in the wake of the Epstein revelations, a move that underscores how toxic the association has become. The decision to wind down the charity is explicitly linked to the newly public emails, including the crude remark about Eugenie, which have raised fresh questions about Ferguson’s judgment and the sources of support around her philanthropic work. For donors and partners, the optics of a charity led by someone whose private messages with Epstein are now public were simply too hard to ignore.
Reporting on the closure notes that the organization’s leadership tied the decision to the impact of the unsealed Epstein material, describing how the crude remark about Eugenie and the broader email trail had damaged confidence in Ferguson’s role. The charity’s move to shut its doors is detailed in accounts that explain how Sarah Ferguson’s charitable organization opted to close after the Epstein email revelations, with the link drawn directly between the emails and the end of the organization’s work.
A long memory of Epstein ties
Part of why this latest revelation hits so hard is that it lands on top of a long public memory of Ferguson’s financial and social ties to Epstein. She has previously acknowledged accepting money from him to help pay off debts, and the new emails show that the relationship extended into chatty, informal exchanges that included references to her family. One account of the correspondence notes that Sarah Ferguson, Princess Eugenie and Jeffrey Epstein are all mentioned in the same set of documents, reinforcing how closely their names are now linked in the public record. The fact that Ferguson’s crude comment about her daughter appears in that context only deepens the sense that she treated Epstein as a trusted contact even after his conviction.
Descriptions of the email trove emphasize that Ferguson’s name appears repeatedly alongside Epstein’s, with references to her daughters and to Prince Andrew woven through the correspondence. One summary highlights that Sarah Ferguson shares Princess Eugenie with ex-Prince Andrew and that she is among the figures whose personal emails with Epstein have now been unsealed, placing her squarely in the group of high profile contacts whose private messages are being scrutinized. That framing, which ties Ferguson, Eugenie and Epstein together in the context of the royal family’s links to the financier, helps explain why the fallout has been so swift.
About the Author
